- From: Arun Ranganathan <arun@mozilla.com>
- Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2011 12:09:29 -0400
- To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- CC: WebApps WG <public-webapps@w3.org>
On 8/14/11 8:58 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote: > For the HTML dependency it seems this specification depends on event > handler attributes as well. Agreed. > > The Typed Arrays specification should either become a normal > dependency or you need to introduce different conformance classes. > Currently it is contradicting. > Hmm.... good point. Currently, the Typed Arrays spec. is useful only for readAsArrayBuffer, which deprecated readAsBinaryString. It should be a normal dependency. > The terminology section contains several terms that are not used, such > as document base URL. It looks like this was copied from > XMLHttpRequest. Could use some cleanup. Agreed. > > No need for a dependency on DOM Level 3 Events in this specification > as far as I can tell. Agreed. > > Web DOM Core is now named DOM Core and is also edited by Ms2ger. OK, I'll fix this. > > DOMException extensions are now in DOM Core, not sure why that > reference is still there as it is not referenced from the draft. > OK, I'll fix this. > Could you please use tools.ietf.org for IETF references? E.g. > http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1630 > OK, I'll fix this. -- A*
Received on Monday, 15 August 2011 16:09:57 UTC