On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 10:14 PM, Robert O'Callahan <robert@ocallahan.org> wrote: > If your implementation had to warp the mouse cursor on Windows to get > accurate delta information, the mouse position in the existing mouse > events would no longer be very meaningful and a new event type seemed > more logical. But assuming Klaas is right, we no longer need to worry > about this. It seems we can unconditionally add delta information to > existing mouse events. So I withdraw that comment. I suspect that, while locked, we still don't actually want to expose the various x and y properties for the mouse. I agree with Vincent that the *other* mouseevent properties are all useful, though, and that the delta properties are really useful in non-mouselock situations. We should just zero all the position information. Even if we can switch all OSes to a delta mode, the position will be arbitrary and meaningless. This seems easier than making a new type of mouse event that exposes all of normal mouse events except the position, and ensuring that the two stay in sync when we add new info. ~TJReceived on Friday, 12 August 2011 16:54:22 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 18:49:47 GMT