W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > July to September 2011

[Bug 13295] The "make disappear a WebSocket object" case should not fail the WebSocket connection

From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
Date: Mon, 08 Aug 2011 21:24:49 +0000
To: public-webapps@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1QqXJZ-0000lJ-HL@jessica.w3.org>
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=13295

Ian 'Hixie' Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|REOPENED                    |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |WONTFIX

--- Comment #3 from Ian 'Hixie' Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> 2011-08-08 21:24:49 UTC ---
By the time you are to "make disappear a WebSocket object", no events are going
to fire ever again for that WebSocket object — the entire event queue for the
Document is about to be cleared.

So the only difference here is at the protocol level, and even there, there is
essentially no difference — in fact the only difference is that "fail" says
that the UA "may" report a problem, as you quote. But then the UA is always
allowed to do that. That's just UI.

So anyway, I don't understand what difference this would ever make. I've left
the spec as is. The requirements on user agents are identical.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Received on Monday, 8 August 2011 21:24:54 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 18:49:47 GMT