W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > July to September 2011

RE: [indexeddb] IDBTransaction.oncomplete event type equals commit

From: Eliot Graff <Eliot.Graff@microsoft.com>
Date: Fri, 8 Jul 2011 17:49:14 +0000
To: Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>, Israel Hilerio <israelh@microsoft.com>
CC: ben turner <bent.mozilla@gmail.com>, "public-webapps@w3.org" <public-webapps@w3.org>
Message-ID: <CE3A5BFD1228D84A8D9C158EEC195FD53CC9AAD8@TK5EX14MBXW601.wingroup.windeploy.ntdev.microsoft.com>
done

> -----Original Message-----
> From: public-webapps-request@w3.org [mailto:public-webapps-
> request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Jonas Sicking
> Sent: Monday, June 27, 2011 6:13 PM
> To: Israel Hilerio
> Cc: ben turner; public-webapps@w3.org
> Subject: Re: [indexeddb] IDBTransaction.oncomplete event type equals
> commit
> 
> On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 10:49 AM, Israel Hilerio <israelh@microsoft.com>
> wrote:
> >>On Thursday, June 23, 2011 1:52 PM, Israel Hilerio wrote:
> >>>
> >>>We noticed that section "4.3 Steps for committing a transaction" talks
> about setting the event type for the IDBTransction.oncomplete event handler
> to "commit".
> >>>Did we intend for the handler to be named "oncommit" or should the
> event type be "complete".
> >>>The current wording implies that the reason the transaction completed
> was because it was committed.
> >>>The different terms made the section a little inconsistent.
> >>>Do we want to change any names or keep it as is?
> >>>
> >>>Israel
> >
> > On Thursday, June 23, 2011 2:04 PM, Ben Turner wrote:
> >>I think "complete" should be the correct type string.
> >>
> >> -Ben Turner
> >>
> >
> > If everyone else agrees with Ben and me, I can work with Eliot to make the
> change to the spec.
> 
> Sounds great.
> 
> / Jonas
> 
Received on Friday, 8 July 2011 17:49:42 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 18:49:46 GMT