Re: Moving XBL et al. forward

Daniel Glazman:
> Ok, so don't focus on the "proposal" word in my message. My comment
> still stands : keeping XBL as an XML-based thing is good for user
> agents that don't need to have knowledge of a given dialect, HTML
> for instance.

We should think of XBL as being a DOM-based thing, rather than an XML-
based thing.  Then we can have HTML syntax for the cases where
everything is within a text/html document, and XML syntax for the cases
like the ones I brought up, where you might be purely within an SVG
document.

-- 
Cameron McCormack ≝ http://mcc.id.au/

Received on Thursday, 10 March 2011 21:47:30 UTC