W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > January to March 2011

Re: [IndexedDB] Two Real World Use-Cases

From: Dean Landolt <dean@deanlandolt.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2011 13:49:33 -0500
Message-ID: <AANLkTinbfAQKp2O_Ncc_pAiL7Y=3LMndnodFG_EYTiUm@mail.gmail.com>
To: Keean Schupke <keean@fry-it.com>
Cc: Joran Greef <joran@ronomon.com>, public-webapps@w3.org
On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 1:32 PM, Keean Schupke <keean@fry-it.com> wrote:

> Actually I am not sure now if SQLite uses BDB now (they might be moving to
> it though). However BDB definitely now has an SQLite-3.0 compatible API now
> and supports better concurrency, as well as AES encryption. So at the moment
> looks like i'm moving to using BDB instead of SQLite, (apart from when size
> of the app package file is an issue and SQLite is provided as part of the
> platform).



Regardless, I think your point stands -- the indexes in SQLite no doubt look
an awful lot like BDB btrees, which look an awful lot like IDB objectStores.
This is a foundational API.
Received on Tuesday, 8 March 2011 18:50:06 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 18:49:43 GMT