W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > January to March 2011

Re: [Bug 11348] New: [IndexedDB] Overhaul of the event model

From: Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>
Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2011 11:24:12 -0800
Message-ID: <AANLkTimPAst8WCGwgmzdti8-kz6FtjL0kUu5QksGfxSP@mail.gmail.com>
To: Jeremy Orlow <jorlow@chromium.org>
Cc: ben turner <bent.mozilla@gmail.com>, public-webapps@w3.org
On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 11:16 AM, Jeremy Orlow <jorlow@chromium.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 7:06 PM, ben turner <bent.mozilla@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> > I think generally avoiding throwing exceptions is a good thing. So for
>> > .errorCode I would say returning unidentified or 0 is the way to go.
>>
>> I would say we should add a code to IDBDatabaseException, NO_ERR = 0.
>> Or else indicate somehow that 0 is reserved for "no exception". Then
>> return that from errorCode.
>>
>> > But it does seem like a
>> > pretty bad bug if you do access these properties before having a
>> > result. So maybe exception is in fact better here.
>>
>> Definitely agreed. People will want to know that they're checking a
>> result too early.
>
> Is this the behavior shipping in ff4?

I don't recall, but looking at the code it looks that way. Ben can
hopefully confirm?

/ Jonas
Received on Friday, 11 February 2011 19:25:16 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 18:49:43 GMT