On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 3:31 PM, Glenn Maynard <glenn@zewt.org> wrote: > On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 4:01 PM, Jeremy Orlow <jorlow@chromium.org> wrote: > >> I talked it over with Darin (Fisher), and he largely agreed with you guys. >> I'll file a bug saying that after unload, all IDBDatabases attached to that >> document should be closed. > > > What happens if a database is open in a page in the back-forward cache? > That's incompatible with onunload having side-effects. > > I know the BF-cache is off-spec, but it's extremely useful and will > hopefully find its way into the standard some day, so it'd be nice to keep > it in mind. > As long as the behavior as far as developers can tell matches the spec, you can do just about whatever you'd like behind the scenes. > I suppose the browser would discard whole pages from the BF-cache on demand > if required by a setVersion call. > That sounds like it'd more or less work. J
Received on Tuesday, 8 February 2011 23:43:50 UTC