W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > January to March 2011

Re: [widgets] Questions regarding to "Test Suite for the XML Digital Signatures For Widgets Specification "

From: Marcos Caceres <marcosc@opera.com>
Date: Tue, 08 Feb 2011 19:51:53 +0000
Message-ID: <4D519ED9.1070605@opera.com>
To: Andrey Nazarov <Andrey.Nazarov@oracle.com>
CC: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>, public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>
Hi Andrey,
I'll try to look into this this week. We've also updated the test suite 
to address the issues you outlined in your previous email. I've also 
updated the spec so the that vendors can define their own <transform> 
(instead of forcing 1.1).

On 2/2/11 7:34 AM, Andrey Nazarov wrote:
> Thank you,
>
> I have one more question:
> Test 19dsa.wgt.
> The deal is when I look on the certificate that is used for this test I
> see that it contains information about DSA Public Key, but the Signature
> Algorithm for this certificate is pointed as SHA1withRSA. Is it correct?
> I am not familiar with DSA algorithm.But in other places where I look
> into certificate with DSA Public Key, I saw that certificate is signed
> with DSA and the SHA-1 hash algorithm (for instance here:
> http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2459.txt)
> Also as I understand the signature value after DSA algorithm using shall
> contain two "big integer", written in the (ASN.1)  form, but in this
> test I see only some byte array without any ASN.1 tags.
> May be the signature value is packed somehow? Haw can I unpack it?
>
> Regards,
> Andrey
>
> On 1/31/2011 9:52 PM, Arthur Barstow wrote:
>> Andrey - on January 26, Marcos proposed changing the c14n algorithm in
>> [1] and [2] and notified the group in [3] that he updated the Editor's
>> Draft [ED] to reflect his proposal. He included rationale in [1].
>>
>>

-- 
Marcos Caceres
Opera Software
Received on Tuesday, 8 February 2011 19:52:38 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 18:49:43 GMT