Re: [chromium-html5] LocalStorage inside Worker

On Jan 27, 2011, at 12:47 PM, João Eiras <joao-c-eiras@telecom.pt> wrote:

> On Thursday 27 January 2011 20:39:50 you wrote:
>> On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 12:06 PM, Charles Pritchard <chuck@visc.us<mailto:chuck@visc.us>> wrote:
>> FWIW: websql is mostly abandoned, though super handy on ios mobile devices.
>> 
>> It's been around for a while in everything other than FF and IE.
>> 
>> IndexedDB is live in Chrome, Firefox and the MS interop team released a prototype for IE.
>> 
>> For the record, we haven't shipped it to stable yet, though we do have a version in the dev channel.  We're hoping to ship before long though (once we get the API back up to date).
>> 
>> Moz and webkit both just implement IDB atop of their internal sqlite processes. That is, thy create a simple websql schema.
>> 
>> For now, yes.  It's actually pretty fast though!
>> 
>> 
>> On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 12:31 PM, João Eiras <joao-c-eiras@telecom.pt<mailto:joao-c-eiras@telecom.pt>> wrote:
>> 
>>> Afaik, websql does not support blobs.
>>> 
>> 
>> If stored as strings, it does. sqlite treats TEXT as an opaque buffer.
>> 
>> Not all binary can be expressed at UTF16.  Note that this is also a limitation of LocalStorage as well.
>> 
> 
> UTF16 represents the character table user agents use when displaying a buffer of text, because nothing prevents you from doing:
> 
> # localStorage.setItem('foobar', "\0\xff\ufeff");
> # alert(escape(localStorage.getItem('foobar')));
> 
> Works in Opera at least, including in web sql 

It's a poorly performing mechanism for binary resources such as images.

We use base64 data uris: it's a big performance hit compared to createObjectUrl Blob/FileSystem.

Received on Thursday, 27 January 2011 21:23:50 UTC