- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2011 09:08:34 +0000
- To: public-webapps@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=10624
Ms2ger <Ms2ger@gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
--- Comment #10 from Ms2ger <Ms2ger@gmail.com> 2011-01-12 09:08:33 UTC ---
LGTM.
https://bitbucket.org/ms2ger/dom-range/changeset/7963331ee0cb
(In reply to comment #8)
> Created attachment 941 [details]
> Proposed spec patch
>
> This specs a reasonable approximation of Firefox's behavior, based on a
> combination of black-box testing and source code inspection. No other browser
> seems to do anything sane here. I haven't actually tried running the
> preprocessor or anything since I have no idea how that works, so I'm more or
> less cargo-culting the specific markup.
It worked out fine; ping me on IRC if you'd like to get it set up.
> Some stylistic thoughts:
>
> * Is the "(respectively)" wording clear enough, or should it be more
> long-winded and explicit?
That's fine, IMO.
> * Should it be "should" or "must" for the direction of the selection if created
> by the user?
I made it a must, people can complain if that's too harsh.
(Also, note that IE's implementation is spec-based.)
--
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Received on Wednesday, 12 January 2011 09:08:35 UTC