W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > January to March 2011

Re: [chromium-html5] LocalStorage inside Worker

From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2011 14:44:31 -0800
Message-ID: <AANLkTin_zTvM-FML6srKL5WMnewdbBG=zQjOQDqsogH7@mail.gmail.com>
To: Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>
Cc: Keean Schupke <keean@fry-it.com>, Jeremy Orlow <jorlow@chromium.org>, robert@ocallahan.org, Glenn Maynard <glenn@zewt.org>, Charles Pritchard <chuck@jumis.com>, public-webapps WG <public-webapps@w3.org>
On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 2:37 PM, Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc> wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 2:11 PM, Keean Schupke <keean@fry-it.com> wrote:
>> would:
>> withNamedStorage('x', function(store) {...});
>> make more sense from a naming point of view?
> I have a different association for 'with', especially in context of
> JavaScript, so I prefer 'get'. But others feel free to express an
> opinion.

In the context of other languages with similar constructs (request a
resource which is available within the body of the construct), the
"with[resource]" naming scheme is pretty common and well-known.  I
personally like it.

Received on Tuesday, 11 January 2011 22:45:23 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 27 October 2017 07:26:29 UTC