W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > January to March 2011

Re: [chromium-html5] LocalStorage inside Worker

From: Glenn Maynard <glenn@zewt.org>
Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2011 19:19:37 -0500
Message-ID: <AANLkTi=MZFNyhXsB2LAcLQwqTPy5HaGcfZ5+S67zP2x8@mail.gmail.com>
To: Charles Pritchard <chuck@jumis.com>
Cc: Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>, Keean Schupke <keean@fry-it.com>, João Eiras <joao.eiras@gmail.com>, public-webapps WG <public-webapps@w3.org>
On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 6:06 PM, Charles Pritchard <chuck@jumis.com> wrote:
> Shouldn't sessionStorage be made accessible?
>
> I don't think localStorage should be (to web workers), but sessionStorage
> seems
> a reasonable request.

Why?  I've wanted to access localStorage from workers in the past, and
if the details for accessing Storage objects are worked out at all,
then exposing sessionStorage but not localStorage seems arbitrary and
unnecessarily restrictive.

-- 
Glenn Maynard
Received on Friday, 7 January 2011 00:23:44 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 18:49:42 GMT