- From: Glenn Maynard <glenn@zewt.org>
- Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2011 19:19:37 -0500
- To: Charles Pritchard <chuck@jumis.com>
- Cc: Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>, Keean Schupke <keean@fry-it.com>, João Eiras <joao.eiras@gmail.com>, public-webapps WG <public-webapps@w3.org>
On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 6:06 PM, Charles Pritchard <chuck@jumis.com> wrote: > Shouldn't sessionStorage be made accessible? > > I don't think localStorage should be (to web workers), but sessionStorage > seems > a reasonable request. Why? I've wanted to access localStorage from workers in the past, and if the details for accessing Storage objects are worked out at all, then exposing sessionStorage but not localStorage seems arbitrary and unnecessarily restrictive. -- Glenn Maynard
Received on Friday, 7 January 2011 00:23:44 UTC