W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > April to June 2011

Re: [indexeddb] IDBTransaction.oncomplete event type equals commit

From: Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>
Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2011 18:12:33 -0700
Message-ID: <BANLkTikeuWKtedm=S+kKchSHo4y2UgjkGg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Israel Hilerio <israelh@microsoft.com>
Cc: ben turner <bent.mozilla@gmail.com>, "public-webapps@w3.org" <public-webapps@w3.org>
On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 10:49 AM, Israel Hilerio <israelh@microsoft.com> wrote:
>>On Thursday, June 23, 2011 1:52 PM, Israel Hilerio wrote:
>>>
>>>We noticed that section "4.3 Steps for committing a transaction" talks about setting the event type for the IDBTransction.oncomplete event handler to "commit".
>>>Did we intend for the handler to be named "oncommit" or should the event type be "complete".
>>>The current wording implies that the reason the transaction completed was because it was committed.
>>>The different terms made the section a little inconsistent.
>>>Do we want to change any names or keep it as is?
>>>
>>>Israel
>
> On Thursday, June 23, 2011 2:04 PM, Ben Turner wrote:
>>I think "complete" should be the correct type string.
>>
>> -Ben Turner
>>
>
> If everyone else agrees with Ben and me, I can work with Eliot to make the change to the spec.

Sounds great.

/ Jonas
Received on Tuesday, 28 June 2011 01:13:29 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 18:49:45 GMT