- From: Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>
- Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 05:08:54 -0700
- To: Marcos Caceres <marcosscaceres@gmail.com>
- Cc: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>, public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>, Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>
On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 4:57 AM, Marcos Caceres <marcosscaceres@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 1:11 PM, Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com> wrote: >> On Mon, 20 Jun 2011 13:01:59 +0200, Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com> >> wrote: >>> >>> Comments on this proposal are welcome and please send them by June 27 at >>> the latest. >> >> I don't think this make sense. Unless it is removed from browsers it is part >> of the web platform and as such requires normative documentation. > > I agree with Anne. Can we just agree on the bits that are implemented > (i.e., drop the structured clones stuff), show interop through a test > suite? Despite the mutex issue, this is still a simple and useful API > for a vast number of use cases. The use cases being "environments which are single-process, i.e. in a near future not any major browsers" and "environments where you don't care about bugs here and there due to race conditions"? / Jonas
Received on Monday, 20 June 2011 12:10:01 UTC