W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > April to June 2011

Re: [Bug 12111] New: spec for Storage object getItem(key) method does not match implementation behavior

From: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2011 12:21:05 -0400
Message-ID: <4DF24471.6040706@nokia.com>
To: public-webapps@w3.org, Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
My take on the comments is that most commentors prefer the spec to be 
changed as PLH suggested in comment #5:

http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=12111#c5

Hixie - are you willing to change the spec accordingly?

-AB

On Jun/8/2011 7:57 AM, ext Arthur Barstow wrote:
> There are now 11 comments on Web Storage Bug 12111, the last remaining 
> bug before moving this spec back to Last Call:
>
>   http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=12111
>
> If anyone has additional comments, please add them to the bug before 
> the end of this week.
>
> I would like to get consensus on this bug soon and would prefer we do 
> so via e-mail and not have to start some type of poll/survey.
>
> -Thanks, AB
>
> On Feb/17/2011 10:17 AM, ext bugzilla@jessica.w3.org wrote:
>> http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=12111
>>
>>             Summary: spec for Storage object getItem(key) method does 
>> not
>>                      match implementation behavior
>>             Product: WebAppsWG
>>             Version: unspecified
>>            Platform: PC
>>          OS/Version: All
>>              Status: NEW
>>            Severity: normal
>>            Priority: P2
>>           Component: Web Storage (editor: Ian Hickson)
>>          AssignedTo: ian@hixie.ch
>>          ReportedBy: mike@w3.org
>>           QAContact: member-webapi-cvs@w3.org
>>                  CC: ian@hixie.ch, mike@w3.org, public-webapps@w3.org
>>
>>
>> http://dev.w3.org/html5/webstorage/#dom-storage-getitem says that "The
>> getItem(key) method must return a structured clone of the current value
>> associated with the given key." but all browsers I've tested return a 
>> string
>> representation of the value instead.
>>
>
Received on Friday, 10 June 2011 16:21:44 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 18:49:45 GMT