W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > April to June 2011

Re: [Widgets] URI spec needs HTTP responses and dereferencing model

From: Marcos Caceres <marcosscaceres@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2011 11:10:09 +0100
Message-ID: <BANLkTimw8zD2r-_81ub8snXMeVC06iW6JQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Karl Dubost <karld@opera.com>
Cc: Rich Tibbett <rich.tibbett@gmail.com>, public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org> 
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 11:03 AM, Karl Dubost <karld@opera.com> wrote:
>
> Le 9 juin 2011 à 19:09, Rich Tibbett a écrit :
>> Are there are any plans to undertake a Provisional (or Permanent) URI
>> Scheme Registration for the widget URI? [1]
>
> Usually a scheme should be used for identifying a new protocol.
> (I know that it has been used for different reasons too).
>
> What are the benefits of having a different scheme?

I'm confused... different to what?


-- 
Marcos Caceres
http://datadriven.com.au
Received on Friday, 10 June 2011 10:10:57 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 18:49:45 GMT