W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > April to June 2011

Re: [IndexedDB] Evictable stores

From: David Grogan <dgrogan@chromium.org>
Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2011 13:00:44 -0700
Message-ID: <BANLkTin377UNqmVpgq2-riwS0erxfcOHgA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>
Cc: Pablo Castro <Pablo.Castro@microsoft.com>, "public-webapps@w3.org" <public-webapps@w3.org>
We (chrome) are still having internal discussions about evictable vs
non-evictable storage; we're on board with worrying about this in v2.

On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 5:33 PM, Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc> wrote:

> On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 3:46 PM, Pablo Castro
> <Pablo.Castro@microsoft.com> wrote:
> > We discussed evictable stores some time ago and captured it in bug 11350
> [1], but I haven't seen further discussion on it and it hasn't gone into the
> spec. I'm curious on where folks are with this? Should we move it to v2?
> Should we just allow UAs to have their own policy around eviction (back at
> TPAC it seemed folks had reasonable but different strategies for handling
> when to allow websites to use storage already).
>
> I think this is a very interesting feature, but one that I'd prefer to
> move to a version 2 as it isn't a required feature and is one that
> seems easy to "retrofit".
>
> / Jonas
>
>
Received on Tuesday, 7 June 2011 20:01:27 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 18:49:45 GMT