W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > April to June 2011

Re: [webstorage] Plan to address open Bugs?

From: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>
Date: Wed, 01 Jun 2011 14:08:08 -0400
Message-ID: <4DE68008.1090806@nokia.com>
To: ext Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>, public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>
CC: Mike Smith <mike@w3.org>, Tab Atkins <jackalmage@gmail.com>
All - based on Hixie's Web Storage bug processing today, at the moment, 
there are no open bugs for this spec. As such, I will start (separately) 
a CfC to publish a new LCWD of Web Storage.

Those working on the widget specs know the Widget Interface spec has a 
normative reference for Web Storage and in order for the Widget 
Interface spec to advance to PR (see [1]), Web Storage should be in the 
Last Call state.

-Art Barstow

[1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2011AprJun/0712.html

On Apr/28/2011 2:33 PM, ext Ian Hickson wrote:
> On Thu, 28 Apr 2011, Arthur Barstow wrote:
>> What is the plan to address the following Web Storage bugs:
>> 1. Bug-12111; spec for Storage object getItem(key) method does not match
>> implementation behavior
>>    http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=12111
>> 2. Bug-12272; Improve section on DNS spoofing attacks to address user attacks
>>    http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=12272
>> 3. Bug-12090; It would be nice to have one Storage object that you could place
>> wherever you want.
>>    http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=12090
> My plan is to address them in the order of they appear on this bug list:
>     http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/buglist.cgi?query_format=advanced&short_desc_type=allwordssubstr&short_desc=&long_desc_type=allwordssubstr&long_desc=&bug_file_loc_type=allwordssubstr&bug_file_loc=&status_whiteboard_type=allwordssubstr&status_whiteboard=&keywords_type=allwords&keywords=&bug_status=UNCONFIRMED&bug_status=NEW&bug_status=ASSIGNED&bug_status=REOPENED&emailassigned_to1=1&emailtype1=exact&email1=ian%40hixie.ch&emailtype2=substring&email2=&bugidtype=include&bug_id=&votes=&chfieldfrom=&chfieldto=Now&chfieldvalue=&cmdtype=doit&order=Last+Changed&field0-0-0=noop&type0-0-0=noop&value0-0-0=
Received on Wednesday, 1 June 2011 18:08:39 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 27 October 2017 07:26:32 UTC