W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > April to June 2011

Re: [IndexedDB] IDBDatabase.transaction needs to specify exception for invalid mode parameter (Bug# 11406)

From: Jeremy Orlow <jorlow@chromium.org>
Date: Tue, 31 May 2011 14:04:24 -0700
Message-ID: <BANLkTi=UwMufaqfZv02d-NXjx5=Ee_R+8Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>
Cc: Israel Hilerio <israelh@microsoft.com>, "public-webapps@w3.org" <public-webapps@w3.org>
Yes in this case, but by default no.  :-)

On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 11:18 AM, Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc> wrote:

> On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 10:56 AM, Israel Hilerio <israelh@microsoft.com>
> wrote:
> > On Tue, May 17, 2011 10:57 AM, Israel Hilerio wrote:
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: public-webapps-request@w3.org [mailto:public-webapps-
> >> request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Israel Hilerio
> >> Sent: Tuesday, May 17, 2011 10:57 AM
> >> To: public-webapps@w3.org
> >> Subject: [IndexedDB] IDBDatabase.transaction needs to specify exception
> for
> >> invalid mode parameter (Bug# 11406)
> >>
> >> Can we update the spec with Jeremy's proposal to throw a
> >> NON_TRANSIENT_ERR for invalid mode parameters on
> >> IDBDatabase.transaction [1]?  That seems reasonable to us.
> >>
> >> Israel
> >> [1] http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=11406
> >>
> >
> > Should I interpret the silence to mean we agree?
>
> Yes :)
>
> / Jonas
>
>
Received on Tuesday, 31 May 2011 21:05:12 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 18:49:45 GMT