Re: [indexeddb] Firing order for VERSION_CHANGE event (Bug# 12179)

On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 10:49 AM, Israel Hilerio <israelh@microsoft.com> wrote:
> For bug# 12179 [1], what additional information we would like to capture beyond what is stipulated in the section below regarding the firing of VERSION_CHANGE events:
>
> 4.8 VERSION_CHANGE transaction steps. [2]
>
> Israel
>
> [1] http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=12179
> [2] http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/IndexedDB/raw-file/tip/Overview.html#version_change-transaction-steps

IIRC the idea was to say that the event fires in the order that the
IDBDatabase objects were opened. At least within a specific page.
Cross page can be hard (or at least very slow) to enforce given that
they can be running in separate processes.

/ Jonas

Received on Tuesday, 31 May 2011 18:17:25 UTC