On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 2:41 PM, Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc> wrote: > On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 2:35 PM, Kyle Huey <me@kylehuey.com> wrote: >> The abort behaviors of FileReader and File[Saver|Writer] differ. The >> writing objects throw if the abort method is called when a write is not >> currently under way, while the reading object does not throw. >> >> The behaviors should be consistent. I don't particularly care either way, >> but I believe Jonas would like to change FileReader to match >> File[Saver|Writer]. > > Yeah, since we made FileReader.readAsX throw when called in the wrong > "state", I believe doing the same for abort() is the better option. > > / Jonas Sounds good to me.Received on Tuesday, 17 May 2011 21:44:31 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 18:49:45 GMT