W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > April to June 2011

Re: [Indexeddb} Bug # 9653 - nullable violations on parameters

From: Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>
Date: Mon, 2 May 2011 16:27:55 -0700
Message-ID: <BANLkTimgtSkbJK+DUR3t02R444Tudaa7HA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Israel Hilerio <israelh@microsoft.com>
Cc: "public-webapps@w3.org" <public-webapps@w3.org>
On Mon, May 2, 2011 at 1:49 PM, Israel Hilerio <israelh@microsoft.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 10:05 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
>> Excellent! I think that should mean that no changes are needed to the
>> IndexedDB spec at all. I can't think of any instances where we use specific
>> interface names while still accepting null values.
>>
>> / Jonas
>
> This implies the bug can be resolved, correct?

Unless someone points out any specific functions in the API that needs
clarification, I think we should close the bug yes.

/ Jonas
Received on Monday, 2 May 2011 23:28:48 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 18:49:45 GMT