W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > April to June 2011

[workers] Processing comments from 10-Mar-2011 LCWD

From: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2011 13:35:27 -0400
Message-ID: <4DB9A55F.5080104@nokia.com>
To: public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>, Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
Hixie, All,

April 21 was the comment deadline for the March 10 LCWD of the Web 
Workers  spec [WW-LC].

Since that LC was published, I noted 2 set of comments and 2 new bugs:

* Adrian Bateman; 9-Mar-2011
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2011JanMar/0877.html

* Travis Leithead; 20-Apr-2011
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2011AprJun/0269.html

* Bug-12067; Jonas Sicking; 14-Feb-2011
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=12067

* Bug-12340; Olli Pettay; 19-Mar-2011
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=12340

Hixie - what normative changes have been made in the ED [WW-ED] (since 
the LC was published) that would affect an implementation based on the 
March 10 LC?

The Process Document defines the requirements for processing LC comments 
[LC] and the WG's main requirement is to respond to all comments.

It appears there is no agreed conclusion to the two comments nor to 
Bug-12067 and there were no responses to Bug-12340.

-ArtB

[WW-LC] http://www.w3.org/TR/2011/WD-workers-20110310/
[WW-ED] http://dev.w3.org/html5/workers/
[LC]http://www.w3.org/2005/10/Process-20051014/tr.html#last-call
Received on Thursday, 28 April 2011 17:35:50 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 18:49:44 GMT