- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2011 11:56:06 -0700
- To: Olli@pettay.fi
- Cc: Erik Arvidsson <arv@chromium.org>, Rafael Weinstein <rafaelw@google.com>, public-webapps@w3.org
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 11:47 AM, Olli Pettay <Olli.Pettay@helsinki.fi> wrote: > On 04/27/2011 09:13 PM, Erik Arvidsson wrote: >> 1. We want<template> to be able to contain arbitrary content that is >> used as the content of the instances that are created from it. Now >> assume that the template element contains some active content such as >> <audio autoplay>, script or simply just an image. We don't want the >> audio to start playing, we don't want the script to run inside the >> template element and we don't want the image to be requested at this >> point. > > <audio> works even if it is not in document, and so > does <img>. > But I see the problem you're trying to avoid. Yeah, we basically just want the actual nodes inside of <template> to be "dead", since their only purpose is to be cloned when you create "real" DOM from the template. How precisely this is accomplished is more-or-less irrelevant at this point. ~TJ
Received on Wednesday, 27 April 2011 18:56:57 UTC