W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > April to June 2011

Re: [IndexedDB] which names can be the empty string?

From: Mark Pilgrim <pilgrim@google.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2011 13:39:30 -0400
Message-ID: <BANLkTinxH1V5K0BFV52Non_3BUeJ+jG+tA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>
Cc: "public-webapps@w3.org" <public-webapps@w3.org>
OK, I'll close out our bugs on the subject and point to this conversation.

Thanks,
-Mark

On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 1:34 PM, Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc> wrote:
> I say we should allow the empty string. Apparently there were no
> specific reason why we added such a check to our code.
>
> / Jonas
>
> On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 6:25 AM, Mark Pilgrim <pilgrim@google.com> wrote:
>> I have no opinion whatsoever, except that the spec should specify it
>> one way or the other so I can close these bugs. :)
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 9:35 PM, Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc> wrote:
>>> Good question. I don't have a strong opinion. It makes sense to me to
>>> allow anything. Don't know I there was any reason we added explicit
>>> checks.
>>>
>>> / Jonas
>>>
>>> On Monday, April 25, 2011, Mark Pilgrim <pilgrim@google.com> wrote:
>>>> 1. Can an object store be named the empty string?
>>>>
>>>> 2. Can an index be named the empty string?
>>>>
>>>> Other things, like databases, are allowed to have a name that is the
>>>> empty string. Mozilla has tests that expect both of the above cases to
>>>> fail, but as I'm porting those tests to WebKit, it's not clear from my
>>>> reading of the spec whether those tests are valid.
>>>>
>>>> -Mark Pilgrim
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
Received on Tuesday, 26 April 2011 17:39:55 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 18:49:44 GMT