W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > April to June 2011

Re: [IndexedDB] Isolation mode -- edit

From: Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>
Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2011 17:37:00 -0700
Message-ID: <BANLkTi=GdttJBiif8E38At5rksx5ECiRrw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Eliot Graff <Eliot.Graff@microsoft.com>
Cc: public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>
On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 4:37 PM, Eliot Graff <Eliot.Graff@microsoft.com> wrote:
>> What we're trying to convey is that two requests placed against different can
>> execute in any order, but that this doesn't matter, and the isolation mode
>> and the transaction scheduling ensures that.
>>
>
> Thanks, that makes sense. Any objection to using your phraseology?
>
> There is no guarantee about the order in which results from requests in different transactions are returned. Similarly, the transaction modes ensure that two requests placed against different transactions can execute in any order without consequence.

I would say "without affecting what resulting data is stored in the
database". This since the order the events fire in can affect the
state of the javascript environment kept by the web page.

/ Jonas
Received on Tuesday, 26 April 2011 00:37:56 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 18:49:44 GMT