W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > April to June 2011

Re: [WebSQL] Any future plans, or has IndexedDB replaced WebSQL?

From: Joran Greef <joran@ronomon.com>
Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2011 17:36:20 +0200
Cc: public-webapps@w3.org
Message-Id: <E08FCB48-29C5-42B2-AEFD-81D94F5B8A03@ronomon.com>
To: Keean Schupke <keean@fry-it.com>
On 04 Apr 2011, at 5:26 PM, Keean Schupke wrote:

> This is ignoring the possibility that something like RelationalDB could be used, where a well defined common subset of SQL can be used (and I use well-defined in the formal sense). This would allow a relatively thin wrapper on top of most SQL implementations and would allow SQLite (or BDB) to be used as the backend.

Yes, if an implementation of RelationalDB arrives which is solid and fast with support for set operations that would be great. The important thing is that we have two competing APIs (and preferably a strong API with a great track record).
Received on Monday, 4 April 2011 15:36:56 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 18:49:44 GMT