W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > April to June 2011

Re: [WebSQL] Any future plans, or has IndexedDB replaced WebSQL?

From: Keean Schupke <keean@fry-it.com>
Date: Sat, 2 Apr 2011 15:30:38 +0000
Message-ID: <BANLkTik6g+hycwyVWm0__yCxUrYP+OowSA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Glenn Maynard <glenn@zewt.org>
Cc: Joran Greef <joran@ronomon.com>, public-webapps@w3.org
Pity.

Anyway RelationalDB defines its API without reference to the underlying SQL
or non-SQL database... So as a candidate for replacing WebSQL, it does not
suffer from that problem.


Cheers,
Keean.


On 2 April 2011 14:56, Glenn Maynard <glenn@zewt.org> wrote:

> On Sat, Apr 2, 2011 at 5:24 AM, Keean Schupke <keean@fry-it.com> wrote:
>
>> Infact now BDB supports the SQLite-3.0 API, you can have two
>> implementation that conform to the same API. So the original reason for
>> abandoning WebSQL seems no longer valid. As there are now more than one
>> implementation of the SQLite-3.0 API it is a de-facto (open) standard.
>
>
> Based on
> http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/E17076_02/html/installation/upgrade_11gr2_51_sqlite_ver.html,
> it's not like an independent implementation.
>
> --
> Glenn Maynard
>
>
>
Received on Saturday, 2 April 2011 15:31:11 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 18:49:44 GMT