W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > October to December 2010

[Bug 11581] New: Is there really need to drop http compability ? This will cause lot of troubles in some http-servers and browsers. This will force developers to use ugly hacks like flash/java based implementations. Is there any reason, wht not to create real robust http-

From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2010 22:11:35 +0000
To: public-webapps@w3.org
Message-ID: <bug-11581-2927@http.www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/>
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=11581

           Summary: Is there really need to drop http compability ? This
                    will cause lot of troubles in some http-servers and
                    browsers. This will force developers to use ugly hacks
                    like flash/java based implementations. Is there any
                    reason, wht not to create real robust http-
           Product: WebAppsWG
           Version: unspecified
          Platform: Other
               URL: http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#top
        OS/Version: other
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: WebSocket API (editor: Ian Hickson)
        AssignedTo: ian@hixie.ch
        ReportedBy: contributor@whatwg.org
         QAContact: member-webapi-cvs@w3.org
                CC: mike@w3.org, public-webapps@w3.org


Specification: http://dev.w3.org/html5/websockets/
Section: http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/complete.html#top

Comment:
Is there really need to drop http compability ? This will cause lot of
troubles in some http-servers and browsers. This will force developers to use
ugly hacks like flash/java based implementations. Is there any reason, wht not
to create real robust http-based comet standard?

Regards,
Artur Dwornik

Artur.Dwornik@gmail.com

Posted from: 62.21.52.51

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Received on Monday, 20 December 2010 22:11:36 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 18:49:42 GMT