W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > October to December 2010

[Bug 11567] New: IndexedDB should utilize the new WebIDL static feature

From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2010 11:19:23 +0000
To: public-webapps@w3.org
Message-ID: <bug-11567-2927@http.www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/>
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=11567

           Summary: IndexedDB should utilize the new WebIDL static feature
           Product: WebAppsWG
           Version: unspecified
          Platform: PC
        OS/Version: All
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: Indexed Database API
        AssignedTo: dave.null@w3.org
        ReportedBy: jorlow@chromium.org
         QAContact: member-webapi-cvs@w3.org
                CC: mike@w3.org, public-webapps@w3.org


Per Jonas:

To construct a key range a set of constructors are available. In
languages with interface objects [WEBIDL], these constructors are
available on the IDBKeyRange interface object. In other languages
these constructors are available through language specific means, for
example as static functions"

But I see that I forgot to say that the IDBKeyRangeConstructors
interface implements these constructors.

However WebIDL nowadays have support for "static" so there is no
longer a need for a separate interface. We should just do

interface IDBKeyRange {
   readonly attribute any     lower;
   readonly attribute any     upper;
   readonly attribute boolean lowerOpen;
   readonly attribute boolean upperOpen;

   static IDBKeyRange only (in any value);
   static IDBKeyRange lowerBound (in any bound, in optional boolean open);
   static IDBKeyRange upperBound (in any bound, in optional boolean open);
   static IDBKeyRange bound (in any lower, in any upper,
                                in optional boolean lowerOpen,
                                in optional boolean upperOpen);
};

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Received on Friday, 17 December 2010 11:19:26 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 18:49:42 GMT