- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2010 21:22:06 -0800
- To: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu>
- Cc: robert@ocallahan.org, Dimitri Glazkov <dglazkov@google.com>, public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>
On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 9:11 PM, Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu> wrote: > On 12/13/10 5:46 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote: >> >> Ah, you're thinking about changes to the normal DOM. We're afraid of >> changes to the template. > > I think roc explicitly said that he thinks the XBL2 spec's section on this > seems ... dispensable. > > I agree with him, for what it's worth. Then we're all in agreement. ^_^ The rules that templates set up for assigning normal DOM nodes to places in the final flattened tree should stick around somehow even if we don't retain a reference to the template itself, so that adding children to the element afterwards has the same effect as parsing them in the original HTML. ~TJ
Received on Tuesday, 14 December 2010 05:22:53 UTC