W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > October to December 2010

Widget Embedding [was: Re: [widgets] running widgets in a regular web page ???]

From: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Nov 2010 11:04:06 -0500
Message-ID: <4CEFDA76.10000@nokia.com>
To: "nathan@webr3.org" <nathan@webr3.org>, Peter Dekkers <peter@jbaron.com>
CC: "public-webapps@w3.org" <public-webapps@w3.org>
Peter - as Nathan alludes, there have been threads related to web 
application embedding on this list. WebApps has a "Widget Embedding" 
deliverable in its charter and currently, work on this item has not started.

Earlier today I created a document for this subject and it includes 
links to related resources as well links to related discussions:


The Problem Statement and UCs + Requirements sections in this document 
are empty. Perhaps those interested in moving this deliverable forward 
can start with those two topics.

-Art Barstow

P.S. Proposal: use [embedding] as the subject: prefix for related threads

On Nov/26/2010 7:10 AM, ext Nathan wrote:
> Peter Dekkers wrote:
>> I've been developing a platform for running multiple types of widgets in
>> regular web pages and of course support for the W3C widgets should not be
>> missing. A very nice specification. I especially like the fact that the
>> "deployment unit" contains all the files and the spec itself tries to be as
>> clear and precise as possible.
>> However the specification seems to be geared towards "standalone desktop
>> applications", and not so much running the widgets as part of a regular web
>> page. When I investigated a little more, there doesn't seem however too much
>> stopping the widget running in an ordinary web page. Two of the main
>> functions missing that I could identify so far are:
>> - A widget.onReady() function that gives the page the change to prepare
>> everything before the widget dependent code is executed.
>> - Some way to proxy XMLHttpRequest in order to avoid not same origin
>> security validations. A simple way would be a widget function that simply
>> rewrites the URL to a proxied URL.
>> Personally I think it would be great to have the W3C widgets run both inside
>> a normal webpage and as a standalone application. However is this also
>> something that might be considered by the people in charge of the
>> specifications, or is this something that will never be in scope? Any
>> enlightenment would be great.
>> P.S For those interested, on http://www.jbaron.com:9090/w3c there are some
>> Opera widgets running in a web page as a small proof of concept (certainly
>> not a complete implementation). The same site also has some pages with other
>> types of widgets.
> :) and so it begins, +1 from me Peter, have been wanting Widgets in the
> main browser context for a long time - seems like an already
> standardized no brainer to me.
> You're not the first to ask, and 'm sure you won't be the last.
> Best&  ty for raising this,
> Nathan
Received on Friday, 26 November 2010 16:04:47 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 27 October 2017 07:26:28 UTC