W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > October to December 2010

[Bug 11348] New: [IndexedDB] Overhaul of the event model

From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2010 11:44:16 +0000
To: public-webapps@w3.org
Message-ID: <bug-11348-2927@http.www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/>
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=11348

           Summary: [IndexedDB] Overhaul of the event model
           Product: WebAppsWG
           Version: unspecified
          Platform: PC
        OS/Version: All
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: Indexed Database API
        AssignedTo: dave.null@w3.org
        ReportedBy: jorlow@chromium.org
         QAContact: member-webapi-cvs@w3.org
                CC: mike@w3.org, public-webapps@w3.org


We talked about this for a while at TPAC.  Here's what I think we agreed upon
at the time:

* All events should propagate from the IDBRequest to the IDBTransaction to the
IDBDatabase.

* For error events, preventDefault must be called in order to avoid a
transaction aborting.  (When you use onerror, you'd of course use false to do
so.)

* If you throw within an event handler, the transaction will abort.  (Catch
errors that you don't want to implicitly abort the transaction.)

* The success event will be non-bubbling (because having onsuccess on
IDBTransaction and IDBDatabase would be confusing).

* The error event should be added to IDBTransaction and IDBDatabase and should
bubble.

* createObjectStore should remain sync and simply abort the transaction on
errors (which are pretty much constrained to quota and internal errors).

* createIndex is the same, except that indexes with a uniqueness constraint and
existing data that doesn't satisfy it will present another (and more common)
case that'll cause the transaction to abort.  The spec should have a red note
that reminds people of this.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Received on Friday, 19 November 2010 11:44:21 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 18:49:42 GMT