W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > October to December 2010

Re: Discussion of File API at TPAC in Lyon

From: Arun Ranganathan <aranganathan@mozilla.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2010 10:36:40 -0800 (PST)
To: Adrian Bateman <adrianba@microsoft.com>
Cc: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>, Web Applications Working Group WG <public-webapps@w3.org>, Adam Barth <w3c@adambarth.com>, Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>, Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
Message-ID: <160290598.379513.1290105400026.JavaMail.root@cm-mail03.mozilla.org>
> On Tuesday, November 16, 2010 8:11 AM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
> > On Tuesday, November 16, 2010, Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
> > wrote:
> > > On Tue, 16 Nov 2010 01:35:05 +0100, Jonas Sicking
> > > <jonas@sicking.cc>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Ok, here is what I'll propose as the final solution:
> > >
> > > FileAPI will define the following WebIDL:
> > >
> > > [Supplemental]
> > > interface URL {
> > >   static DOMString createObjectURL(in Blob blob);
> > >   static void revokeObjectURL(in DOMString url);
> > > };
> > >
> > > [...]
> > >
> > > Unless I hear otherwise from people, I'll assume that everyone is
> > > happy with this.
> > >
> > >
> > > This looks great. Will this make it into Firefox 4?
> >
> > Assuming we can get everyone to agree quickly enough, yes.
> 
> We're okay with this too, especially if it doesn't change. :)


So it (soon) will be written, and so it will be done ;)

The only think I'm not sure about is the proposed spec language about *prototype usage.  But aside from that caveat, which I'll run by heycam, I'll put the migration to URL in the editor's draft.

-- A*
Received on Thursday, 18 November 2010 18:37:13 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 18:49:42 GMT