W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > October to December 2010

Re: Request for Last Call review of RDFa Core 1.1; deadline

From: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2010 12:24:06 -0500
Message-ID: <4CE56136.7070408@nokia.com>
To: ext Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>, WebApps WG <public-webapps@w3.org>
Hi Manu,

Thanks for the heads-up on the RDFa API plan.

WebApps does not have regularly scheduled calls so your RfC was a good 
way for you to ask WG members and the WebApps community at large for 
comments.

If anyone has comments and/or questions regarding the following LC:

   RDFa Core 1.1: Syntax and processing rules for embedding RDF through 
attributes
   http://www.w3.org/TR/2010/WD-rdfa-core-20101026/

Please send them to the following mail list by December 6 at the latest:

   public-rdfa-wg@w3.org
   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdfa-wg/

If meeting the December 6 deadline is problematic, please speak up as 
soon as possible.

-Art Barstow

On Nov/18/2010 12:07 PM, ext Manu Sporny wrote:
> Hi WebAppers,
>
> The RDFa Working Group is making good progress on the RDFa API and hopes
> to have it into Last Call in the next couple of months. We intend to ask
> the Web Apps WG for an "official" review on the RDFa API before we enter
> LC. RDFa Core 1.1 and XHTML+RDFa 1.1 went into the Last Call during the
> past few weeks. The LC review period ends on December 6th, 2010, and
> December 9th 2010, respectively.
>
> In order to make sure that the review will be thorough, we would like
> WebApps to review RDFa Core 1.1, as it provides the basis for the RDFa
> API. If this group cannot perform a review before the LC end period,
> we'd be open to extending the review deadline for this group. Are there
> any volunteers for Last Call review of the RDFa Core 1.1 specification?
>
> http://www.w3.org/TR/2010/WD-rdfa-core-20101026/
>
> Could you please mention the request for review during an upcoming
> telecon? I can be present on the call to ensure that the group
> understands the reason that we're asking for a review from this WG as
> well as answer any questions that the group may have on the RDFa WG's
> timeline.
>
> -- manu
>
Received on Thursday, 18 November 2010 17:24:50 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 18:49:42 GMT