W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > October to December 2010

Re: revokeObjectURL behavior

From: Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>
Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2010 11:31:11 -0800
Message-ID: <AANLkTimJM+ijp1cgYB4ZFRPQ_h6TVaNKtUJDx1ja2D3N@mail.gmail.com>
To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
Cc: Webapps WG <public-webapps@w3.org>
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 11:09 AM, Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 17 Nov 2010 19:11:40 +0100, Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc> wrote:
>>
>> What's the use case? Do you really expect authors to use it?
>
> I was trying to think of something other than throwing. But maybe throwing
> for incorrect usage is best.

My suggested behavior was to do nothing for incorrect usage. I.e. when
trying to revoke a different-origin URL or something that isn't a
generated URL at all.

See the last paragraph of my original email.

/ Jonas
Received on Wednesday, 17 November 2010 19:37:02 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 18:49:42 GMT