W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > October to December 2010

Re: Updates to FileAPI

From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2010 12:05:29 +0100
To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>, "Arun Ranganathan" <aranganathan@mozilla.com>
Cc: "Eric Uhrhane" <ericu@google.com>, "Web Applications Working Group WG" <public-webapps@w3.org>, "Ian Hickson" <ian@hixie.ch>, public-device-apis <public-device-apis@w3.org>, "Jian Li" <jianli@chromium.org>
Message-ID: <op.vl103fct64w2qv@anne-van-kesterens-macbook-pro.local>
On Thu, 11 Nov 2010 17:33:04 +0100, Arun Ranganathan  
<aranganathan@mozilla.com> wrote:
> I agree that a readonly Date object returned for lastModified is one way  
> to go, but considered it overkill for the feature.  If you think a Date  
> object provides greater utility to simply get at the lastModified data,  
> I'm entirely amenable to putting that in the editor's draft.

It depends on what the use cases are I suppose. But if the last modified  
date is going to be displayed somehow having a Date object seems more  
flexible.


-- 
Anne van Kesteren
http://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Friday, 12 November 2010 11:06:21 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 18:49:41 GMT