Re: [IndexedDB] .value of no-duplicate cursors from ben turner on 2010-11-11 (public-webapps@w3.org from October to December 2010)

From: ben turner <bent.mozilla@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2010 08:13:35 -0800
To: Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>
Cc: Jeremy Orlow <jorlow@chromium.org>, Webapps WG <public-webapps@w3.org>
Message-ID: <AANLkTimhG8K9OGMCN5YUE7EPuo1UV6EkOASvK7vXys=b@mail.gmail.com>

On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 8:07 AM, Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc> wrote:
> The reason I specced it they way I did, with the "lowest" key always
> being used, is that this way a NEXT_NO_DUPLICATE and a
> PREV_NO_DUPLICATE cursor iterate the same entries. It seems unexpected
> that reversing direction would return different results?

I agree.

-Ben

Received on Thursday, 11 November 2010 16:14:28 UTC