W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > October to December 2010

Re: [Bug 10430] New: [IndexedDB] We need to make it more clear IDBRequests can be reused and spec readyState's behavior

From: Jeremy Orlow <jorlow@chromium.org>
Date: Mon, 1 Nov 2010 08:46:18 +0000
Message-ID: <AANLkTimD1MsmtFBFuV9dPTWes_GwzcJKKMMCsJ+UTSoh@mail.gmail.com>
To: bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
Cc: public-webapps@w3.org
Actually, what's the use case for readyState?  I can't think of any uses
that we'd want to encourage.  Maybe we should just remove it.

J

On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 3:50 PM, <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org> wrote:

> http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=10430
>
>           Summary: [IndexedDB] We need to make it more clear IDBRequests
>                    can be reused and spec readyState's behavior
>           Product: WebAppsWG
>           Version: unspecified
>          Platform: PC
>        OS/Version: All
>            Status: NEW
>          Severity: normal
>          Priority: P2
>         Component: Indexed Database API
>        AssignedTo: andreip@google.com
>        ReportedBy: jorlow@chromium.org
>         QAContact: member-webapi-cvs@w3.org
>                CC: mike@w3.org, public-webapps@w3.org
>
>
> http://www.w3.org/TR/IndexedDB/#idl-def-IDBRequest right now clearly
> assumes
> IDBRequests are only going to be used once.  But IDBCursor.continue()
> reuses
> them.  At the very least, we'll need to clean up the .readyState section to
> make it clear it's possible to go from DONE to LOADING (or we can remove it
> altogether?).  I think some notes explicitly pointing out that some parts
> of
> the API reuse them would be helpful as well.
>
> --
> Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
> ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
> You are on the CC list for the bug.
>
>
Received on Monday, 1 November 2010 08:47:12 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 18:49:41 GMT