W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > October to December 2010

Re: Replacing WebSQL with a Relational Data Model.

From: Keean Schupke <keean@fry-it.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2010 17:31:26 +0100
Message-ID: <AANLkTimUMCTNR8OtjVVGGSukrRy9EooRQQ2tOuJ=TPpr@mail.gmail.com>
To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
Cc: Jeremy Orlow <jorlow@chromium.org>, Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>, WebApps WG <public-webapps@w3.org>
Hi,

>(FWIW, I'm also not quite sure that leaving Web SQL behind is a good idea,
but unfortunately I am not really
>capable of specifying the SQL dialect.)

Thats the great thing about the relational algebra, its a very useful subset
of SQL, is complete and has a formal mathematical definition.

Infact we can refer to a programming language as relationally complete, if
it provides for the construction of all relations derivable from some set of
base relations by the application of the primitive algebraic operations.
(thanks to Google for that definition).


Cheers,
Keean.


On 26 October 2010 16:24, Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com> wrote:

> On Tue, 26 Oct 2010 17:06:14 +0200, Jeremy Orlow <jorlow@chromium.org>
> wrote:
>
>> WebSQLDatabase is essentially deprecated, so it's not worth looking at
>> things in that context.  And I don't think anyone's interested in adding
>> yet another storage mechanism to the web platform.  And thus that leave just
>> IndexedDB.
>>
>
> Well, there's the file-based storage mechanism:
> http://www.w3.org/TR/file-system-api/
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> Anne van Kesteren
> http://annevankesteren.nl/
>
>
Received on Tuesday, 26 October 2010 16:32:00 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 18:49:41 GMT