- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2010 13:33:00 +0200
- To: "Garrett Smith" <dhtmlkitchen@gmail.com>, "Erik Arvidsson" <arv@chromium.org>
- Cc: "Cameron McCormack" <cam@mcc.id.au>, public-webapps@w3.org
On Tue, 19 Oct 2010 19:06:15 +0200, Erik Arvidsson <arv@chromium.org> wrote: > On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 09:50, Garrett Smith <dhtmlkitchen@gmail.com> > wrote: >> Changing the wording for each collection would be painfully >> repetitious, involving a spec author for each spec. There is not any >> super interface collection defined that also defines `item`, >> callability, property access, etc. though if there were then all >> collection type objects inherit from that and would avoid shotgun >> surgery. That would seem to be something for DOM 4 core, if such a >> thing is to be written. > > WebIDL has a section for sequence but it is not fleshed out yet. Yeah, it would be nice if sequence mapped to that so that NodeList could be defined as a sequence instead, same for StyleSheetList, etc. And then Web IDL would take care of all the details rather than each specification. -- Anne van Kesteren http://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Tuesday, 26 October 2010 11:34:17 UTC