W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > October to December 2010

Comments on the http://www.w3.org/TR/widgets/

From: viji <viji@borqs.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2010 18:10:31 +0530
Message-ID: <4CBD91BF.6010808@borqs.com>
To: public-webapps@w3.org
CC: viji <viji@borqs.com>

  Here are some of the comments on http://www.w3.org/TR/widgets/ W3C 
Working Draft 5 October 2010

1. 7.9.2. The email Attribute

mentions that email is a keyword attribute where

A keyword is a string that is reserved for the purpose of this 
specification. The value of a keyword attribute is a keyword  that is 
one of a finite set specified in the attribute's definition in the case 
given in this specification.

Does this mean that the finite set will be defined in the specification 
? or the spec assumes that there will be a finite set based on the 
attributes definition in the specification.

This would mean that the email attribute can only hold emails and not 
any other string ?

For param element's name and value attributes, how is the finite set 
defined ? Do we let the feature defined specify the set ?

2. 9.1.9. Rule for Getting Text Content with Normalized White Space

  In the example given, is the dir attribute for Dude ignored ? The 
sentence "The resulting widget name would be "The Awesome Super Dude 
Widget" but represented as a localizable string that retains" does not 
seem complete

3.  7.11. The icon  Element and its Attributes

     Global attributes, src, width, height.

  global attributes, xml.lang does not apply as mentioned in the spec.
  dir also would not apply to icon element ?
  Is Global attributes required as an attribute to icon element.

  Same thing applies to content element, feature element, param element

Received on Tuesday, 19 October 2010 13:09:52 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 11 February 2015 14:36:46 UTC