W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > July to September 2010

[widgets] Best practice / recommendation for widget id scheme?

From: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2010 07:10:25 -0400
Message-ID: <4CA1CD21.4010208@nokia.com>
To: public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>

  The widget element's id attribute says "An IRI attribute that denotes 
an identifier for the widget." and is silent on the value of the IRI's 
scheme.

What, if anything, do vendors recommend for the scheme?

What are the advantages and disadvantages of using the widget: URI 
scheme [ignoring the process-related issues that currently, the widget 
URI scheme spec is still a LCWD]?

-Art Barstow
Received on Tuesday, 28 September 2010 11:11:12 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 18:49:40 GMT