W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > July to September 2010

Re: PROPFIND vs "simple methods", was: [CORS] HTTP error codes in preflight response

From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2010 21:16:18 +0200
To: "Jonas Sicking" <jonas@sicking.cc>, "Julian Reschke" <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Cc: "Webapps WG" <public-webapps@w3.org>
Message-ID: <op.vjf7tgei64w2qv@anne-van-kesterens-macbook-pro.local>
On Wed, 22 Sep 2010 20:19:08 +0200, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>  
> For PROPFIND (and other methods defined to be "safe"): it really doesn't  
> make sense to do a preflight OPTIONS for PROPFIND. Both are defined to  
> be safe. Both could have broken server implementations.

We don't want to keep updating the "safe" list. So they're all "unsafe".  
Or maybe not "unsafe", just not compatible with HTML forms.

Anne van Kesteren
Received on Wednesday, 22 September 2010 19:17:28 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 20 October 2015 13:55:36 UTC