W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > July to September 2010

Re: A URL API

From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 19 Sep 2010 17:09:36 -0700
Message-ID: <AANLkTikCRY2Roin=+Xfyoo0hxB0kjXkg=Kf9GiJ+Nqz9@mail.gmail.com>
To: Devdatta Akhawe <dev.akhawe@gmail.com>
Cc: Adam Barth <w3c@adambarth.com>, WebApps WG <public-webapps@w3.org>, Garrett Smith <dhtmlkitchen@gmail.com>
On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 5:03 PM, Devdatta Akhawe <dev.akhawe@gmail.com> wrote:
> hi
>
> Is the word 'hash' for fragment identifiers common? I personally
> prefer the attribute being called 'fragment' or 'fragmentID' over
> 'hash' - its the standard afaik in all the RFCs.

'hash' is the name given to the fragment identifier in the Location
object.  It's pretty common.

~TJ
Received on Monday, 20 September 2010 00:10:32 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 18:49:40 GMT