W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > July to September 2010


From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 19 Sep 2010 17:09:36 -0700
Message-ID: <AANLkTikCRY2Roin=+Xfyoo0hxB0kjXkg=Kf9GiJ+Nqz9@mail.gmail.com>
To: Devdatta Akhawe <dev.akhawe@gmail.com>
Cc: Adam Barth <w3c@adambarth.com>, WebApps WG <public-webapps@w3.org>, Garrett Smith <dhtmlkitchen@gmail.com>
On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 5:03 PM, Devdatta Akhawe <dev.akhawe@gmail.com> wrote:
> hi
> Is the word 'hash' for fragment identifiers common? I personally
> prefer the attribute being called 'fragment' or 'fragmentID' over
> 'hash' - its the standard afaik in all the RFCs.

'hash' is the name given to the fragment identifier in the Location
object.  It's pretty common.

Received on Monday, 20 September 2010 00:10:32 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 11 February 2015 14:36:45 UTC