W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > July to September 2010

Re: ArrayBuffer and ByteArray questions

From: Jian Li <jianli@chromium.org>
Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2010 12:13:46 -0700
Message-ID: <AANLkTikzXbshM3MFc_QAgQVS3Lm468MbsHCyYgzN-6CC@mail.gmail.com>
To: Eric Uhrhane <ericu@google.com>
Cc: whatwg@lists.whatwg.org, Web Applications Working Group WG <public-webapps@w3.org>
Yes, we only need to add it to BlobBuilder so that it can be applied to both
FileReader, XHR.send and any other place that take the blob.


On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 10:57 AM, Eric Uhrhane <ericu@google.com> wrote:

> On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 4:09 PM, Jian Li <jianli@chromium.org> wrote:
> > Hi,
> > Several specs, like File API and WebGL, use ArrayBuffer, while other
> spec,
> > like XMLHttpRequest Level 2, use ByteArray. Should we change to use the
> same
> > name all across our specs? Since we define ArrayBuffer in the Typed
> Arrays
> > spec
> > (
> https://cvs.khronos.org/svn/repos/registry/trunk/public/webgl/doc/spec/TypedArray-spec.html
> ),
> > should we favor ArrayBuffer?
> > In addition, can we consider adding ArrayBuffer support to BlobBuilder,
> > FormData, and XMLHttpRequest.send()?
>
> It seems like an obvious addition for BlobBuilder or XHR.send, but do
> we need it in both, or is one sufficient?
>
> > Thanks,
> > Jian
> >
>
Received on Tuesday, 14 September 2010 19:14:17 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 18:49:40 GMT