- From: Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>
- Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2010 14:33:59 -0700
- To: Joćo Eiras <joao.eiras@gmail.com>
- Cc: WebApps WG <public-webapps@w3.org>
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 2:17 PM, Joćo Eiras <joao.eiras@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Oh, another issue is what type the Node.attributes object should be.
>> It's currently a NamedNodeMap, but that won't work since those return
>> Nodes. We could either create AttrMap interface with the exact same
>> API, except that it returns Attrs instead of Nodes, or we can remove a
>> few of the functions.
>>
>> I suggest we remove at least the mutating functions, leaving us with:
>>
>> interface AttrMap {
>> Attr getNamedItem(in DOMString name);
>> Attr item(in unsigned long index);
>> readonly attribute unsigned long length;
>> Attr getNamedItemNS(in DOMString namespaceURI,
>> in DOMString localName);
>> };
>>
>
> Can't you reuse something like NamedMap<Attr> ?
We could, though it might be over engineering. And if we remove the
getNamedItem(NS) functions, then it's no longer a Map but rather
simply an array.
/ Jonas
Received on Friday, 10 September 2010 21:34:53 UTC