W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > July to September 2010

Re: XBL2

From: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>
Date: Fri, 03 Sep 2010 13:45:00 -0400
Message-ID: <4C81341C.3000809@mit.edu>
To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
CC: public-webapps@w3.org
On 9/3/10 1:37 PM, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
> On Fri, 03 Sep 2010 19:24:03 +0200, Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc> wrote:
>> For what it's worth, it's a requirement for us to be able to use
>> namespaces of some sorts since we're planning on implementing XUL
>> using XBL2. There are however multiple ways we can do this and I'll
>> need to look into which approach XUL developers prefer.
>
> Why do you need namespaces for XUL? Isn't it all in the same namespace?

The relevant stylesheets are applied to all documents, because XUL can 
be used in any XML document, obviously.

As a simple example, the binding used for xul:iframe shouldn't be used 
for html:iframe.

-Boris
Received on Friday, 3 September 2010 17:45:35 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 18:49:40 GMT