Re: [IndexedDB] Implicit transactions

For what it's worth I haven't found using it this way to be that hard or
confusing but that could be because I'm a little more aware of the
underlying implications when opening object stores.

-Mikeal

On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 11:47 AM, Shawn Wilsher <sdwilsh@mozilla.com> wrote:

>  On 8/4/2010 10:53 AM, Jeremy Orlow wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> Whoa....transaction() is synchronous?!?  Ok, so I guess the entire premise
>> of my question was super confused.  :-)
>>
>>  It is certainly spec'd that way [1].  The locks do not get acquired until
> the first actual bit of work is done though.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Shawn
>
> [1]
> http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/IndexedDB/raw-file/tip/Overview.html#database-interface
>
>